RE:RE:RE:2014 Bulk Sample compared assuming 6.1 carats/100 tonsBecause they want to test the hypothesis that the grade is under represented in the both the NAR and BHP bulk samples. They also want to acquire additional material to see if they can "fill out" the size-frequency distribution curve to see if there is the potential for a "Lucara" outcome. And for $5.6M they get 40%. For Burgundy, a reasonable risk reward. Have a think about how much money has been spent on the project to date by BHP and NAR. As for the top industry insiders that are invested, they have been invested since NAR bought this off of BHP. WIthout Burgundy, NAR would be dead in the water, and with it the "top industry insiders", by which you mean Eira, Gren and John. These guys are not infallible. Have a look at Lucara and tell me how you would feel if you had bought at 4 bucks? I am not saying that there is not a chance, and as a NAR shareholder this represnets a bit of a last chance. I take unbridge with people whose analysis is fatally flawed. Lets all make sure we have eyes wide open on this one. If you are buying shares now, do yourself a favour and by a LottoMax ticket as well. Diversify your portfolio!