Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

NEO Battery Materials Ltd V.NBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  NBMFF

NEO Battery Materials Ltd. is a Canada-based battery materials technology company. The Company is focused on developing silicon anode materials for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles, electronics, and energy storage systems. With a patent-protected, low-cost manufacturing process, it enables longer-running and ultra-fasting charging batteries compared to existing technologies. The Company is focusing on developing silicon anode materials, NBMSiDE, through nanocoating layers. Its three types of products, NBMSiDE-P100, NBMSiDE-P200, and NBMSiDE-C100 are manufactured through its nanocoating technology and are based on metallurgical-grade silicon with purities of at least 99.95%. It has developed a transformative and one-step nanocoating process to manufacture silicon anodes. Its material provides improvements in capacity and efficiency over lithium-ion batteries using graphite in their anode materials.


TSXV:NBM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by JonnyJon Oct 29, 2012 6:23pm
94 Views
Post# 20537035

RE: RE: No answer from IR

RE: RE: No answer from IR

Zuckonit I find your post somewhat offensive, I'm one of those common shareholders you speak of and have never once had an issue getting through to BCG, most of the time the phone was answered within 3 rings and have never had a problem getting my questions answered.

 I fail to see why a common share holder is less important than someone that purchased a PP considering the amount of shares I purchased throughout the year and in the end we will all suffer the same loss.

I am also NOT responsible for the state BCG is in just because I didn't buy into a PP, try pointing at the ones running the company, have you looked at this RedQuest? If that doesn't raise some red flags then nothing will.

This idea they are selling to people that day traders or flippers are responsible for the SP is ridiculous, there hasn't been enough volume all year to even bring that into question, all the serious investors were waiting to see if BCG would deliver before they bought in and now It would seem they have nothing to deliver.

Bottom line is, as Fowler told me on the phone, "we took on more than we should have this year."

Bullboard Posts