RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Very, very irritating.....nozzpack wrote: You obviously don't pay much attention to the facts when comparing direct and indirect ownership , share for share , nor the lawsuit implications, nor the tax implications nor why CK owns most of his NFG through Pali......Like Me
because he owns Pali which is a holding company that he controls not you and he got his Pali shares at zero cost and got NFG shares in Pali at near zero cost They formed NFG out of an asset Pali aquired and the claims Pali had and NFG grew from there . You personally own zero shares in NFG and control zero shares in NFG that's the truth even if you think otherwise you can be delusional if you want but this is the truth