RE:NOU in the big leagueI believe I may have suggested that Gregory Bowes was trying to get Bissett Creek into production for nearer to 20 years. Never the less, my point about his failure to do so was more the crux of what I was dirving at and also my point about sometimes failure being rewarded.
I didn't say it was Graphex exactly that was to blame or that Graphex left NGC hanging. the sudden change in geopolitical idiocy when dealing with China is most to blame for that outcome; not Hugues Jacquemin nor Gregory Bowes.
NGC has other options, as I pointed out in my earlier post. Hopefully at least one of such potential joint venture "BAM" commercialization partnership options or any others could pan out for NGC.
The company's management needs to land "a whale" of a company to financially support all it's proposed and quite ambitious endeavors.
In regards to NOU hitting the big leagues, you'll note I was plainly referring to NOU's have in listed at the NYSE and very slowly progressed forward.
I have known what you are referring to with respect to the Forge Nano process and the requisite use of Cl 2 for a good while now and will definitely agree with you that in comparison to NanoXplore's superior process manufacturing of graphene-silicon enhanced "BAM", NOU's use of that Forge Nano spheronization and coating process, which requires the employment of chlorine gas and ALD, is certainly not optimal in many respects.
I agree it's quite the dangerous gas being employed, to say the least, and also raises the input costs and unnecessary complexity of Forge Nano's process.
It's a batch process; certainly not a continuous process for the spheronization and coating of NOU's graphite "BAM".
I can go on and yet you get the jist youknowwhat.