Is the PorocarbTM" Candidate Product "Commercially Viable"?I know more than enough about the battery materials chemistries and battery components materials development and manufacturing industry to absolutely know that within a ten year period of Heraeus Group's "PorocarbTM" product development, Heraeus Group's battery materials R&D representatives (Michael Grimm et al) would have had immensely more than ample time to both fully develop several iterations of the "PorocarbTM" product and to have all those iterations of the "PorocarbTM" anode and cathode additve material product comprehensively performance tested, validated, qualified and necessarily "certified" for mass industrial scale production (1,000 tpa at the very least) by and on behalf of certain 10 year long collaborating parties.
You need to ask the now President of NGCBMG and formerly the perhaps lead battery materials development representative for Heraeus Group's battery R&D division, Michael Grimm, whether the Heraeus group owned "PorocarbTM" High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathode additive battery material has in fact been comprehensively tested as necessarily comprising anode or cathode found within specifically battery cell "A samples" as yet?
Should you ask, Michael Grimm, President of NGCBMG, and/or Hugues Jacquemin et al the right questions, you'll be enabled to arrive at the appropriate conclusions entirely based on fact.
Get the hint people.
If any at all, do take note of any Heraeus Group undertaken NDA's with global battery component materials developers and manufacturers and also with global battery cells manufacturers and their respective automotive manufacturing partners.
More importantly, ask, Michael Grim, President of NGCBMG, the right questions and you'll be enabled to arrive at the appropriate conclusions entirely based on fact.
Ask the now President of NGCBMG and formerly the perhaps lead battery materials development representative for Heraeus Group's battery R&D division, Michael Grimm, whether the Heraeus group owned "PorocarbTM" High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathode additive battery material has in fact been comprehensively tested as necessarily comprising anode or cathode found within specifically battery cell "A samples" as yet?
When you ask Mr. Grimm the aforestated and must be answered questions, do keep in mind that after 10 long years of "PorocarbTM" product "development", should Michael Grimm, Hugues Jacquemin or anybody else who would certainly know the quick one second answer to such a question tell you no, not comprehensively tested as comprising A sample battery cells, one could immediately conclude that the "PorocarbTM" "product candidate" is simply not as yet "commercially viable".
What's more, you would expect if this is the case, and I am not suggesting that it in fact is the case, Messrs Hugues Jacquemin, Greggory Bowes, Guillaume Jacq, et al., i.e. collectively the officers and directors of the company, would have needed to most specifically disclose and therein duly inform Northern graphite Corporation "minority" equities investors of the very fact potentially being, once again, I don't know as yet that this would in fact be the case, that the representatives on behalf of this corporation purchased access to a "PorocarbTM" product candidate which is not as yet "a commercially viable" product.
Again, I do not as yet know whether this is in fact the case.
Perhaps these are questions for one of you, who appreciates being lied to by or on behalf of the representatives of a TSX-V listed equities issuer, to ask and have answered by either of Michael Grimm, Hugues Jacquemin, Greggory Bowes et al.
You are welcome.