Is the PorocarbTM" Candidate Product "Commercially Viable"? I know more than enough about the battery materials chemistries and battery components materials development and manufacturing industry to absolutely know that within a ten year period of Heraeus Group's "PorocarbTM" product development, Heraeus Group's battery materials R&D representatives (Michael Grimm et al) would have had immensely more than ample time to both fully develop several iterations of the "PorocarbTM" product and to have all those iterations of the "PorocarbTM" anode and cathode additve material product comprehensively performance tested, validated, qualified and necessarily "certified" for mass industrial scale production (1,000 tpa at the very least) by and on behalf of certain 10 year long collaborating parties.
You need to ask the now President of NGCBMG and formerly the perhaps lead battery materials development representative for Heraeus Group's battery R&D division, Michael Grimm, whether the Heraeus group owned "PorocarbTM" High-performance porous hard carbon anode and cathode additive battery material has in fact been comprehensively tested as necessarily comprising anode or cathode found within specifically battery cell "A samples" as yet?
Should you ask, Michael Grimm, President of NGCBMG, and/or Hugues Jacquemin et al the right questions, you'll be enabled to arrive at the appropriate conclusions entirely based on fact.
Get the hint people.