Additional Area Staked...Why?So, I am trying to piece together why NVDEF decided to stake the additional claims to the NW of the project. It was after receiving the assays for holes 2 & 3 and drilling hole 4 that we received the news release stating that they staked these claims. They also mentioned at that time that they were beginning the next phase of their drill program and would begin vectoring to the target(s). So, they had to have decided to stake the additional acreage after the assays they received for hole 1. Why you ask? Well, it takes quite a bit of time to stake all of those claims in the field and then produce the legals to record them. Heck, they may have already been staking that area before they even drilled hole 1. Did we miss some information along the way that made this area important? I mean they went off the originally planned fence line on the north to drill hole 6 (they went further NW), but why? The only thing I keep coming back to is that the water drains northerly, but the bedrock grades to the south. Water would drain through the gravels in a northerly direction, but backflow to the south when it hit the bedrock. So, did they figure out that the source could be to the north and the groundwater chemistry to the south might have been partially/mostly backflow water coming down the bedrock sloping to the south?? I am not a geologist and I am just throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks... Anyone have an theories? Realty