RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Where is the negotiation?Thanks for sharing. I think based on their press release (clip below) we can agree that their messaging was highly misleading. It was clear to me that they were going in a different direction (flip/flop) as it relates to the use of excess cash (debt paydown vs buybacks). All of these types of decisions are "options" not "obligations" so that answer is BS. Also it is very strange that this change happened when Pelham was in the process of their mini-tender becuase the stock has been cheap for a while and management should have been aware of a large payment from Ramu was forthcoming. It is clear to me this was a strategy to use NKL's cash to bid up the price making it harder for Pelham to buy a meaningful stake. Selfserving
"In the opinion of management and the board of directors of the Company.............using Nickel 28’s excess liquidity to buy back common shares at their current trading price is highly accretive to net asset value per share"