RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Pathetic to say the least !!!!Management doesn't owe you an apology for assays that they've already told you twin and expand the historic resource but that aren't out yet officially because labs are slow. That's hilarious.
The banner headline in this sector right now is backed up geochem labs, you can't miss it. Ian spoke to shareholders on the 12th Aug noting "unbelievably busy" labs. Adam repeated they were backed up on Mines and Money last week. Assays aren't "delayed" as the company never set a date, but there's your "explanation" anyway.
12 week worst wait times for assays compared to 6 weeks normally, according to other juniors.
A set of five cores will have taken until late September to drill out, log and split, according to the single-shift/one or two rig setup Oroco had going at the beginning of the programme, plus a further week (at most) to transport the cores up to ALS in Vancouver. Now mid-November, all this implies that we're 6 weeks into the lab wait for assays. If labs are backed up to the tune of 12 weeks and rumors are true that Oroco paid for an expediated service, Adam's qoute to "expect drill results to flow later in November" from the Torrey Hills presentation sounds possible indeed. He's got vastly more insight than me/us anyway, and he's been willing to share it, so you should listen.
These shares represent a real opportunity imminently before the first official assays in 30 years open the door to institutional investment - take it or leave it.