Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Oroco Resource Corp V.OCO

Alternate Symbol(s):  ORRCF

Oroco Resource Corp. is a Canadian mineral exploration company focused on the assembly of mineral concessions which make up the Santo Tomas porphyry copper project in Sinaloa State, Mexico. The Santo Tomas project is a copper porphyry deposit defined by 106 diamond drill and reverse circulation drill holes totaling approximately 30,000 m.


TSXV:OCO - Post by User

Comment by mrobporon Dec 03, 2021 8:30am
290 Views
Post# 34193864

RE:Its not Oroco taking forever its the lab

RE:Its not Oroco taking forever its the labNo doubt that's been the anecdotal case - nice to see a direct comment from a junior on the subject. Thanks for the article. 

It's still curious, though, why Oroco would continue to use qualifiers like "very near future," rather than "we don't know" or "the labs won't commit to dates right now." I suppose the labs could have promised them timeframes and then didn't meet them. I don't know how this works, but I imagine when a company gets assays back from a lab, they have to review and see if results coincide with their own analysis. If not, there may be a back and forth regarding any signifiacant variance. To that end, I've heard these called "quality control" issues. Not suggesting that is the case here, but there could be many things happening that are just not public.

In any case, I did reach out to a Canadian lab to inquire about timeframes and they did not deign to reply :) 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>