Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pure Energy Minerals Ltd V.PE

Alternate Symbol(s):  PEMIF

Pure Energy Minerals Limited is a Canada-based lithium resource developer company, which is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company's primary project is the Clayton Valley Project (CV Project), which is located in Clayton Valley, Esmeralda County, Nevada. The CV Project is located in central Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately halfway between Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, United States. The Clayton Valley Project contains an inferred mineral resource of approximately 218,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). In addition, the Company is focused on new processing technologies for lithium through its collaboration with global technology partners, Tenova Advanced Technologies, at the process testing, engineering, and design stage on the Clayton Valley Project. The Company's subsidiaries include 0891884 B.C. Ltd., Esmeralda Minerals, LLC, 1056625 B.C. Ltd., 1061582 B.C. Ltd. and LT Capital Holdings, LLC.


TSXV:PE - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Christofferon Mar 23, 2017 2:54pm
106 Views
Post# 26021849

RE:RE:Shared claim between PE.V and CYP.V - Glory hole

RE:RE:Shared claim between PE.V and CYP.V - Glory hole If your confirmation is correct, then I feel satisfied and will lean back and enjoy the ride, for the next years.

However if they plan to mix directly, I am concerned about magnesium content could become to high to be economically viable, hence more then 3 % Highsmith said in a presentation it is not viable. Some of the samples on the cyp.v is right at the limit as I recall 2,98. Guess that is measured from the desolvemnent in "rain water" bleach. However do you mix with brine containing magnesium, you will risk higher content then 3%.

hence brine through Tenova Bateman plant, saltwater out without magnesium, then you mix with cyp.v claim, not risking high magnesium content.

otherwise they can just use as an example 2/3 pe.v brine with 1/3 cyp.v brine, this is properly more simple, so I like it better.

Seems we are in good hands, then.
Bullboard Posts