Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pure Energy Minerals Ltd V.PE

Alternate Symbol(s):  PEMIF

Pure Energy Minerals Limited is a Canada-based lithium resource developer company, which is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company's primary project is the Clayton Valley Project (CV Project), which is located in Clayton Valley, Esmeralda County, Nevada. The CV Project is located in central Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately halfway between Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, United States. The Clayton Valley Project contains an inferred mineral resource of approximately 218,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). In addition, the Company is focused on new processing technologies for lithium through its collaboration with global technology partners, Tenova Advanced Technologies, at the process testing, engineering, and design stage on the Clayton Valley Project. The Company's subsidiaries include 0891884 B.C. Ltd., Esmeralda Minerals, LLC, 1056625 B.C. Ltd., 1061582 B.C. Ltd. and LT Capital Holdings, LLC.


TSXV:PE - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Christofferon Apr 02, 2017 2:22pm
156 Views
Post# 26065074

RE:RE:Excellent article - Pure Energy and others

RE:RE:Excellent article - Pure Energy and othersI have today requested the author of the article to update his point of view on PE.V on twitter today and he replied he would have a look at it.

@dankogaion

His previous article was not positive but he is clearly very knowledgeable and well studied into this specific topic.

I would like his revised view, since plant technology has now been proven successful at high efficiency 85% as I recall, and that was a big unknown when he wrote his article.

CV 7-8, are new and if someone can interpretate on what has been informed so far, composition and depth, I believe the author can.

Don't know if he will update his article prior to PEA, but worth looking out for.
Bullboard Posts