Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Pure Energy Minerals Ltd V.PE

Alternate Symbol(s):  PEMIF

Pure Energy Minerals Limited is a Canada-based lithium resource developer company, which is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties. The Company's primary project is the Clayton Valley Project (CV Project), which is located in Clayton Valley, Esmeralda County, Nevada. The CV Project is located in central Esmeralda County, Nevada, approximately halfway between Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada, United States. The Clayton Valley Project contains an inferred mineral resource of approximately 218,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE). In addition, the Company is focused on new processing technologies for lithium through its collaboration with global technology partners, Tenova Advanced Technologies, at the process testing, engineering, and design stage on the Clayton Valley Project. The Company's subsidiaries include 0891884 B.C. Ltd., Esmeralda Minerals, LLC, 1056625 B.C. Ltd., 1061582 B.C. Ltd. and LT Capital Holdings, LLC.


TSXV:PE - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Christofferon Apr 25, 2017 3:32pm
144 Views
Post# 26164432

RE:Brief from Leo

RE:Brief from LeoThanks.

Looks like it has been more difficult this time around for PP, hence the delay to eventially/hopefully reach the CAD 2 mill.

PEA third delay, I can only see two reasons: 1) Did the new lithium bill affect the report? 2) Mr. Shellhass wish to go throug the report, with his view from revenue and earnings experience/ project execution expence/ legal experience and clayton valley experience. Beliee the latter is rather realistic.

I dont mind they finetune PEA, but what I wish for is lithium in CV7 and CV8 and I want to know today rather then tomorrow.
Bullboard Posts