Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

PetroFrontier Corp V.PFC

Alternate Symbol(s):  PFRRF

PetroFrontier Corp. is a Canada-based junior energy company. The Company is engaged in exploring for and the production of petroleum and natural gas in western Canada. It is focused on developing two Mannville heavy oil plays in the Cold Lake and Wabasca areas of Alberta. The Company has interests in approximately 16 gross (15 net) sections arising from several joint operations with the wholly owned energy companies of the Cold Lake First Nations (CLFN). The Company also has a joint venture agreement with the wholly owned energy company of the Bigstone Cree Nation (BCN), covering 1,024 gross (922 net) hectares in the Wabasca area of north-central Alberta, of which half has been earned as a leasehold interest. Those interests are located between CNRL’s prolific Brintnell enhanced oil recovery project producing approximately 50,000 bop/d of heavy oil and Cenovus’ proposed 10,000 bop/d thermal heavy oil project.


TSXV:PFC - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by mining_pays_my_billson Aug 02, 2014 12:18am
244 Views
Post# 22804867

RE:Re Article about the Statoil selected wells

RE:Re Article about the Statoil selected wells@ozgood: I was encouraged by that as well. I did a bit of research on vuggy porosity as well, and here is an interesting article I found: (pay particular attention to the last line) https://www.beg.utexas.edu/indassoc/rcrl/rckfabpublic/vps01.htm Vuggy Pore Space Vuggy porosity is pore space that is within grains or crystals or that is significantly larger than grains or crystals; that is, pore space that is not interparticle. This definition deviates from the restrictive definition of vugs used by Choquette and Pray (1970) as nondescript, nonfabric-selective pores, but it is consistent with the Archie terminology and with the widespread and less restrictive use in the oil industry of the term "vuggy porosity" in referring to visible pore space in carbonate rocks. Vuggy porosity is divided into two classes based on the manner in which the vugs are connected. Separate vugs are interconnected only through the interparticle porosity. Common examples are as leached grains and fossil chambers. Touching vugs form a interconected pore system of significant extent. Common examples are solution enlarged fractures and large, irregular cavities. Fracture porosity is included as a type of touching-vug porosity to be inclusive. So, what I get from that is this: For oil to flow you want the vugs to be connected by little veins, you don't want them to be isolated within the rock. They're full of oil, you want to get it out of the isolated space. Vug-to-vug connections are good for oil flow. Now, say the vugs are isolated, but fracturing the rock would make hairline connections between them, for the purpose of oil recovery that is as good as vug-to-vug connection. You can make oil flow with that. And, as your last post highlighted, in the PFC recovered cores there is oil-filled vugs, and Statoil thinks there is high potential for fracturability, i.e. connecting the vugs via fractures (fracking). 'So.....what you're telling me is there's a chance?" (line from Dumb and Dumber) It still looks good. High risk, but the more info we get it seems to be getting de-risked more and more. All of this is my understanding of what I've read and my understanding of rock mechanics, I could be wrong, I'm in hard-rock mining, not unconventional oil, I don't understand oil as much as I'd like to. Take it as my opinion only, and continue to all do your own due diligence.
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse