RE:RE:Is there any support for this anymore?!?!I agree, as you say, that they wouldn't have attracted the talent they have, that the potential is 'huge' given what they own at Stillwater, and that this has not traded anywhere close to its 'true value'. But the fact is they have done a piss poor job at building support for the stock...as can be plainly seen by the price erosion. No one gives a $hit about online pitches from the CEO to retail, or setting up a booth at industry trade shows. In order to build support, you 'dog and pony' show every bloody brokerage that will let you walk thru the door and you keep talking with everyone and anyone who has demonstrated an inclination to buy shares or promote the company to their clients. They obviously don't do that, or enough of it, to support the stock. Existing shareholders, and the brokerage houses they should be tight with, could view this as a great opportunity to average down, acquire more shares. There should be good volume from bargain-hunter buyers that know the company well. That isn't happening. I've been saying the same bloody thing for years now, and nothing changes. I don't care that Rowley and team are loaded up with stock and are similarly watching their holdings drop by 65% plus, they're getting paid to wait. I'm not. By the time they get around to doing a deal with a major they've either run out of options and need to do 'something', and/or they're diluting like crazy at stupid low prices just to stay afloat (because I don't see a bunch of $$ coming in from exercising on warrants that may or may not still be in the money now). Neither scenario is appealing.