RE:found this thought id share -- NANALYZE----The writer seems like a juvenile......I have to agree with others here. The Nanalyze site is 'un-business-like' based on what I am reading from the writer's style....because if it were serious and scientific, it would be taken more seriously and less of a Rolling Stone type of formatting with the comments...
Just for the record, I have a B.Sc. and in science, it is frowned upon to not turn over stones or show significant biases like this writing is representing perhaps....so that is why I can't take it seriously. I really appreciate the efforts however, of the fellow shareholders on looking for some exposure.
Patience everyone....let the business run its course. I purchased my shares based on the science and am hoping for the business plan to take it over and work in concert. Having a mag that seems un-scientific does the business no good.
I am accumulating this in concert with FGD so, I sold some late afternoon with a nice little profit (still holding plenty) so count me in as a buyer in an under-appreciated QNC tomorrow.