Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Rochester Resources Ltd V.RCT

Alternate Symbol(s):  RCTFF

Rochester Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based company engaged in the exploration and development of its mineral property interests in Mexico. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Mina Real and San Francisco Properties, which are located in the state of Nayarit, Mexico, east of the state capital city of Tepic. In addition, the Company has an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in the Santa Fe Property. The Mina Real Property consists of 11 mining concessions and one mineral claim encompassing a total area of over 21,367.42 hectares (ha). The contiguous Santa Fe Property consists of one mining concession totaling approximately 3,852.66 ha. The San Francisco Property consists of 12 mining concessions encompassing over 18,125.05 ha. Its subsidiaries include ALB Holdings Ltd., Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V. and Compania Minera Santa Fe S.A. de C.V.


TSXV:RCT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by POG1200on Jun 14, 2010 12:33am
649 Views
Post# 17185032

On TJ's "Own-Up" Effort:

On TJ's "Own-Up" Effort:TJ,
 
Your post is just about 100% cut and paste!  There’s next to nothing written from you to help with the meaning of what you present. There are no thoughts of your own being expressed. You address none of my questions. 
 
Also, your post is easily misinterpreted.  How is anyone to know that the blue-font excerpt is from an e-mail to you from Dan Boase?  With DB’s signature at the bottom, the way it is, your whole post appears as if it is from Dan Boase!  For the longest time I thought it was...  DB had to straighten me out on it before I knew it wasn’t from him. 
 
The May19th date is out there without any introduction or explanation.  It looks like a mistake.  (I sure hope stefche hasn’t placed his buy order thinking there is going to be news from EL through DB this Wednesday...)
 
Nice job on the effort, and making a showing, but the lowest of marks for clarity.  If you post another comment, go for taking a bite out of one of my questions, and try to say something with some teeth in it.
 
Try again?

Bullboard Posts