Then came the "Infamous " Ceo "letter to shareholders lolCEO Steve Marshall Message to CUV Ventures Corp ShareholdersAt this important juncture, in which I feel we are crossing into a psychological Phase 2 of CUV’s future, I have decided to address frequentand, sometimes abundant, comments I have received and, read, during the recent past,in thissingle solemn statementto all shareholders.First and foremost, it has become apparent to me that there appears to be an investor philosophy,on the junior or ventureexchanges,in which,officers of a company should or even, must, hold significant equity positions in the companies they manage. For the record, I do not subscribe to this, in my view, anomalous philosophy for, what I consider,obvious reasons. Firstly, the entire premise of free-market economics and, the very emergence of publicly quoted companies, since the days of The Dutch East India Company, aligns itself to theconceptand, upon the underlying premise,thatthe majority of a company’s equity be in the possession of public shareholders. This junior exchange beliefthat,listed companies should be quasi-private in nature,hinting at massive insider holdings, appears to be contrary to macroeconomics, commonlogic and, the very underlying principlesof public equity marketsand/or free market economies. I also believe that the failure to adhereto these free market principals,placesin perilcertain aspects of transparency and, public shareholder controland, if the business happens to be retail in nature, unwelcome massive insider holdings,squarely place shareholders at a disadvantage. Due to the aforementioned,I cannot and, have never, subscribedto a philosophy or,notionthat, for a public company to become efficaciousor credible,the officers must be holding disproportionatevolumesof publicly trading shares. Likewise, I see the espousalof this philosophyas an investing anomaly, due to its incompatibility with the stock market as a whole.The world’s largest public companies, quoted on the most prestigious exchanges, do not adhere to this quasi-private shareholder concept, seemingly rampant on Venture orJunior exchanges and, while I am the CEO of CUV, I will not subscribe to, what I consider, an erroneous requisite.While my previous escrow restriction may have confused shareholders into assuming that I advocate this thinking, this forced adoption to which I was subjected, does not and, has never, coincided with my personal beliefs as theofficer of a publiclyquoted company. https://www.docdroid.net/XNkscSI/steve-marshall-message-to-shareholders.pdf
Tim Fernback ( supposed ex cfo ) was my next due diligence essay here .. his career all began back in Dec 2016 for this venture trading symbol.