RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I am not worried Since I think your post is referencing me, I'll be ready to respond to it better or not after the publishing of the EOY reports supposedly later today or on next trading session because I could be wrong on what I would say before....and be corrected if the figures will be surprisingly great contrary to my present pessimism.in view of the dismal sp and volume.
However as some inkling ... Read carefully the latest Qwerty22 post above yours, particularly its last lines..... You have been posting on this board for quite a while, so try to contrast it with all the positive news and promises in March 23 from the CO and how financials would be better by June 30.***
Now I know you read my June posts when I was criticized and even insulted by the like of , Lifeboat, Mingzhu, investor22, Querty22..( keep in mind these profiles could be just 1 or 2 posters ). I do not mind being criticized from that's the gist of discussions my opinions particularly by posters with firm beliefs in The success of the CO, its mission etc. That's the gist of discussions...
However the posters cited above ( again in my opinion) do not fit that category because they act more as support for all the CO insider propaganda ( for lack of another word) . because if you tally only the June 23 list and numbers of contracts... no matter as you cut it, something is amiss if the reports will only tell us to wait longer for profiability because of what they refer and we should accept as their good fundamentals. without any way to check and double check if any contract is real..
*** I wasn't around at Reliq' inception in 2016 nor when it was sued for falsities shortly after,
I started trading it around 2019. but ever sice the co followed the same pattern you mentioed of over promising early then always come up with nonsensical excuses as to why it never materializes.
Though I prefer to be proven wrong... we'll know by next week unless it's postponed a bit.