RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Promises vs Expectationsqwerty22, good on you for making rational statements. We don't yet know how this will end, but the great GM%, growing revenue and profitability do point us in a direction. The posts of aaaaaargh and lscfa remind me of why I put those sad sacks on ignore so long ago. Cheers...i22
qwerty22 wrote: Lisa has also (honestly) explained the company is not the company she envisioned all those years ago. In the webinar she admitted she wanted nothing to do with hardware. My take is SaaS is still a challenge so hardware fills a gap at present.
I see limited value in trying to match 4 year old statements of intent with the present business, that presentation also has them having big data licensing. It is what it is. It's a company with potential (best shown by it's signed up clients) which is finding it challenging to convert that potential in a full product (revenue generating patients). That to me is where the risk/reward lies not in five year old projections. Help us understand how that breaks down.
Everybody knows (or should know) this company has been through several reboots, there is no straight line between 2018 and 2023. If you don't like their past failures, if you think that represents their likely future, then you probably shouldn't be in the stock. Bottom line. They are teetering on the edge of (in)viability atm, they might stay like that for a few quarters. It's a genuine question which way it breaks from here.
aaaaaargh wrote: Thanks for your amazing due diligence as always. Once you learn to read a Reliq statement and discern what is true and not true, one learns to read lifeboats posts the same way. You will notice he left himself "outs" for when he gets caught... such as "past several years". He knows the truth but will always use projection and deflection to try to discredit any criticism of the company. He should spend less time trying to get a date with investor22 and more time having integrity.