RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Stance from new ManagementSome actual balance in the comments lately - at least from posters I don't have on ignore.
My own opinion is that, notwithstanding her inexcusable penchant for overstatement and her lack of commitment to collections for a considerable period of time (some but not all of which was understandable), she was a necessary ingredient for the success the company has had to date - software breadth/efficacy, growing industry connections, many and bigger contracts, and documented revenue growth. All of that was accomplished on a shoestring budget. That IMHO is her legacy. Given the changing metrics of contract awards and the recent financing, it seems to me - and I've already said so - that there is enough inertia for her to step aside and that this event is likely a net positive at this time. The new leader needs to be a bit more corporate, and also needs to be a bit more credible with the investment community.
In a completely unrelated matter, I've said there's likely something wrong with non-shareholders posting on this bulletin board rabidly and regularly for years now. I stand by that, unless someone has some sort of alternate, reasonable explanation for that kind of behaviour.