Relevium Technologies Inc V.RLV.H

Back to Cheapie Land

[AlwaysSkeptical]

And just wait until you see real numbers when they're forced to disclose the dilution, inability to grow their CORE business, and lack of actual success.

With this stock, sell on the PR bounces, because it'll always come back down to the sh!t management, whose only goal is to keep the lights on and get paid via their consulting company.

You realize he's not even an EMPLOYEE of the company????

[MichaelSilvia]

AlwaysSkeptical AKA Chas15, it is easy to see in your post history, that you are a failure. You bashed the company relentlessly when it was 3 cents, saying it would go to 0. It went to 8.5 and will soon blow past that. When the stock halted, you assumed the worst. It was the best news in the history of the company. Now the share price pulls back from 8.5 cents, and you crawl out of your hole to

[Chas15]

Ya and it's now at 4.5 cents and most likely finishing off the week at 4 cents, so what's your point? Back to where it was before the news....usually when something feels wrong, it is. Buy all you want, hold that bag till your wife divorces you for losing her vacation fund, I don't care. But don't say I didn't warn you! 

[AlwaysSkeptical]

I actually agree with you, perhaps I wasn't clear.  I'll never go long on RLV, it's just a con job with the sole onjective of keeping the CEO's consulting checks coming through. My gameplan will continue to go short anytime the PR suckers drive the SP above the wall of dilution...and like Icarus, make money when the sale orders at 5/6 cents come in by the millions... BTW, no

[Chas15]

I was replying to Micheal Silvia, the RLV train conductor, not you Always. 

[Stocksteward]

Lol, based on what? A $20MM USD contract is a con job? You shorts are desperate, like a fat hog at the bar at 2AM. B Please, give us some facts or be gone.

[Chas15]

I never said it was a con job, but you can't deny where this has been trending since the spike. It's just typical RLV. If there's no additional news then it's be back to 0.03 in a month, that's the way it goes with RLV. 

[FrequentBuyer]

Michael Silva apparently has you on ignore, so I will call you a loser based on your track record and share the following contradiction: You bashed the stock at 2.5 cents saying people's wives would be angry. Incorrect.

[MichaelSilvia]

I see that you're new here and are not ignoring Chas yet. Chas likes to sell shares at a loss. He cluttered the board with 2-3 other usernames of his to bash the stock everyday at 0.03 saying there was nothing happening behind the scenes because of low volume. That was obviously not the case, and I feel sorry for anyone who might have listened to him and not bought at 0.03. They would be

[MichaelSilvia]

I see that you're new here and are not ignoring Chas yet. Chas likes to sell shares at a loss. He cluttered the board with 2-3 other usernames of his to bash the stock everyday at 0.03 saying there was nothing happening behind the scenes because of low volume. That was obviously not the case, and I feel sorry for anyone who might have listened to him and not bought at 0.03. They would be