"just making sure I'm not confusing anyone. ;)"In my original post I stated that Verdal-2X had been logged NOT tested. "Potential log pay encountered in three prospective reservoir units". Please read this twice, if you have any trouble then read it a third time. https://www.petrodorado.com/news/2014-01-06.pdf In my original post I also made a comment regarding a new zone. This was indeed a mixup and I was referring to Dorados, BUT the reason I was confused was because there was a similar statement regarding Verdal-1. Please read this. "It was through the drilling of the Verdal-1 well in 2010 that the stratigraphy and thickness of the units in the area became clear and that the thrust anticlines had abundant seal section over the main reservoir, protecting the basal Cretaceous reservoirs from being breached to outcrop or leaking to the surface. The Verdal-1 well also revealed two new valuable pieces of information: (1) the greater depth of the yet undrilled basal Cretaceous Caballos reservoir unit and most significantly, (2) that the Cretaceous units on top of the Caballos formation are unexpectedly hydrocarbon-charged to the degree that it was not possible to properly control the drilling of the well as it was designed and drilling was abondoned hundreds of feet above the main Caballos reservoir target." May I emphasize "Cretaceous units on top of the Caballos formation are unexpectedly hydrocarbon charged". So in conclusion: the areas above the Caballos are hydrocarbon charged, and the Verdal 2X well has logged 3 potential reservoir units in that area. Hope this post wasn't too confusing for you and your condescending winks.