RE:PEA - Silica projectThe question is : why do you lie ? why dont you do any serious due diligence on the company ?
From RRS November 30, 2015 News Release : NI43-101 Resource Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") A contract has been signed with Met-Chem located in Montreal, Quebec, who will complete a NI43-101 compliant resource report and at the same time, a PEA. Site visits by Met-Chem recently occurred with studies and the gathering of exploration data initiated. Met-Chem is an independent firm, established in 1969 as a consulting engineering company with its headquarters in Montreal, Quebec. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of UEC Technologies LLC which is part of United States Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Met-Chem offers a wide range of technical and engineering services for any project size during a project's life-cycle from the exploration, conceptual or feasibility stage to the development of facility closure strategies. Met-Chem will be working closely with Anzaplan as it completes its testing regime and with Rogue's exploration staff on an ongoing basis as they compile drill and assay results. Source : https://www.rogueresources.ca/s/news.asp?ReportID=731769 And from their latest february 2016 presentation :
"Majority of the 2016 Anzaplan and MetChem work is prepaid." Source : https://www.rogueresources.ca/i/pdf/ppt/Feb-2016-PPT.pdf
So why lying ? why no serious due diligence ? why misleading potential investors ? why bashing RRS ?
you told me in a private message that you have been approached by CME management during PDAC 2015 and you signed a contract with them as a paid consultant to CME, but does that justify bashing other companies ? does CME management approve of your dishonest acts against RRS ? i am sure they dont.
So please stop spreading lies and bashing RRS, and try to concentrate more on your work as a consultant to CME. They gave you stock options and you want to exercise them at the highest price, great for you, but no justification to bash RRS. It is unethical and dishonest. Thanks. polo11 wrote: PEA - Silica project
At PDAC 2015 CME -UBR and RRS start together at starting line with all a silica deposit in Quebec.
Each deal decided a different business way to give value to their shareholders.
RRS - PEA
On the way to define a resource-
Charaterization done with Anzaplan
Suppose to deliver a PEA for September -
Look like deposit don't have HPQ
Looking for a small business like SITEC
As A PEA take about min 4 to 6 months to be deliver - look that will be difficult to have it for September if contract for it not give now.
Question is: Is they will do one with what they know today after Anzaplan and driling campain?
UBR - PEA
UBR start drilling his resource - a first step to produce a PEA - Resource should be known during summer - As my source - IT is a very hight purity one -low tonnage - max 500k ton
As a PEA to built a plan or project to tranform quartz into silicon metal need to define the technology and establish the design and cost of the plan; PEA will be able to be start defore the company has completed his pilote phase with Succes.
UBR already face delay in LAB test that will probably postpone the prototype ( phase 2 )to be deliver this year.
Next step - if they succeed phase 1 and 2 will be to finance a pilote phase - built it and run it with success then produce a PEA.
As the technology is not proven - UBR will have to go through PFS ( min 1 year) phase before doing a FS ( another year)
I let you speculate on the timeline
CME has his PEA
CME choose the traditional way. A proven resource - transform it in a traditional way.
They were the only one to have a silica deposit that was already in production in the past for ferro alloys.
They attracted world class management.
The focus was to bring short term value without risk - Key was Quebec low electricity rate.
A year later - CME with less than 45m shares out has already a strong PEA published and a market cap value (20m) represent only 2% of the NPV (675m).
CME alredy Started his environmental study in jun 2015 - a 27 months process.
As the technology is proven - they can go immediately to the Feasability Study ( 5m cost ) -
Also because it is proven technology - equipment smelter co finance aroud 60 to 65% of the project with garantee loan - SMS Demag in Germany and Tenova in Italy
If CME deliver his smelter Silicon metal plan;and it is looking good; you can expect a 1/2 b market cap phase 1for 2019 and 1B phase two without any technology risk.
I just want to remember you that present market cap in under 20m.
At PDAC 2106 ; a guy working for the Financial Post told me that in 40 years experience; i never see a so experience team for a junior company.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.ubr/uragold-bay-resources-inc#yHkUWdHo7k1o5GTT.99