Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Rocky Mountain Liquor Inc V.RUM

Rocky Mountain Liquor Inc., through its subsidiary Andersons Liquor Inc. (Andersons), owns and operates private liquor stores. The Company owns and operates 25 liquor stores in Alberta. The product mix generally offered by Andersons at its retail stores includes beer, spirits, wine and ready to drink liquor products, as well as ancillary items, such as juice, ice, mix and giftware. The Company is focused on locations outside of the urban centers (Edmonton and Calgary) and on specific sites with maximum traffic and minimal competition. Andersons is also focused on store operations and optimizing its operating margin. Its liquor stores in Alberta are located in Athabasca, Athabasca, Beaumont, Cochrane, Devon, Edmonton, Fairview, Fort Macleod, Morinville and others.


TSXV:RUM - Post by User

Comment by jcorobowon Jul 23, 2021 11:42am
94 Views
Post# 33596118

RE:Insider buying - 200 000 shares at 0.20$

RE:Insider buying - 200 000 shares at 0.20$Appears to be a good thing. Clearly this guy already had a substantial holding in the company, but felt it was necessary to take himself over the 10% hurdle and is now a registered insider. He appears to be from the east coast, just like the family that started the company. 

The real implication is that there is now a publicly disclosed minority shareholder with 10%+. THis is significant becuase:

"with 10% or more shareholding, the shareholders either singly or in a group are eligible to file for oppression and mismanagement against the majority and the management of the company, should the shareholders feel the need to file such a case looking at company’s operations."

So as long as he is not in bed with the majority owners already, his existence means minority holders are at less of a risk of being screwed over. On the other hand, he could also be part of the buying group that is taking over the company as part of the strategic review?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>