RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:January 2019 investor presentation This is my favorite, when I am right people begin personal attacks, it is always the same pattern.
Nobody is saying they should give HQ to people with spoon to make them miserably sick. You can use the best safe product in that market for comparison. Most people would buy 1067 if it is better or at least equivalent of the best option available. Then why do not you make a head to head test and say "1067 is safer and better than the best product in this market. Here is the proof."
You also know why. Not doing this gives you flexibility to bend or hide full picture. A trial with positive control is riskier and it is easier to pump without it like "look we have amazing results - it is not better than other products but anyway you do not know it.-"
Putin here is a friendly advice to you, first learn how to deal with facts and not to attack people saying them. Then may be later you can start judging someone's professional capabilities. But while doing this remember that I was the only one pointing experimental issues here. And I have been always right about Sirona, without a single exception.