Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Sirona Biochem Corp V.SBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  SRBCF

Sirona Biochem Corp. is a cosmetic ingredient and drug discovery company with proprietary platform developed at its laboratory facility in France. Through its wholly owned subsidiary TFChem S.A.R.L., the Company specializes in stabilizing carbohydrate molecules. The principal activities of the Company include development of cosmetic and pharmaceutical active ingredients. TFChem develops and markets its GlycoMim technology for pharmaceutical and biotechnology comp anies. TFChem’s proprietary chemistry technology can be applied to the development of several pharmaceutical domains such as cancer, diabetes, pain and inflammation and cardio-vascular diseases. Its cosmetic therapeutic area includes skincare-dark spot corrector (Rx & OTC), cell preservation and repair (including keloid and scar therapy), skincare-anti aging/anti-wrinkle and skincare-cellulite treatment. It has developed an active ingredient, TFC-1067 for the treatment of Dyschromia (Dark spots on the skin).


TSXV:SBM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by malibukion Feb 22, 2019 4:09pm
136 Views
Post# 29401906

RE:News misinterpreted?

RE:News misinterpreted?There is no misinterpretation. 1067 has much lower concentration compared to products in the market and slow effect is not something unexpected. We will hear soon and data will speak itself whether it is good enough or not.

They never showed head to head preclinical skin patch comparision including the marketed products. And I do not see any good reasons not to do so.

Just be aware, this is still not risk free even though the first refusal agreement was a good sign.


Bullboard Posts