Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Comment by cracker12on Sep 10, 2014 7:00pm
452 Views
Post# 22925084

RE:RE:In receivership.....

RE:RE:In receivership.....former directors who were supposed to be representing the shareholders interests all along....and include the officers for that matter. Whichofficers exercised stock options in the last 5 years to benefit financially head of receivership and who was paid what for letting this asset sink into receivership ...especially with the POG at this level....wondering if there is a case here?  Presumably, the receiver will ensure that anyone in the wings with a "friendly hand" will be of some benefit to the existing shareholders I would hope, if the system still works. There is still an asset to sell somehow.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>