RE:Sic Vs Nfg vs LabJosemann wrote: Obviously nobody has crystal ball but thoughts is Sic potential to pass LAB and come within half SP Nfg?? ?
Market is nuts to value LAB more than SIC. Yes I know LAB could hit it big being on the same fault, however like I said before, LAB could have lots of gold but be very deep and it may take years to find the hot spot. Lots of speculation.
I do not like comparing SIC with NFG, the monster. SIC has great land packages but NFG has show they have multi-million ounces on their zones including largely KEATS at this point. You do not need a 43-`101 to know they have a lot of gold. Also 100KM strike on the AP fault and they have a secondary fault also. SIC could get to a much much higher valuaation of a few hundred million by closing the gap on various zones at Moosehead, having the pending holes at Golden Hope support lithium potential at Golden Hope in the short term. Grey RIver will resume in late spring. So lots of potential.
Anything can happen in junior mining. Mining all the above is like walking into a dark room and turning on the lights. YOu never never know what you will find. So the correct answer to your question, yes anything is possible, but play the odds and there is a good chance we can reach 20%+ of NFG valuation. That is still a multi-bagger.
BC