Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Search Minerals Inc V.SMY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SHCMF

Search Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based integrated mineral exploration and development company. The Company is focused on developing critical rare earths elements (CREE), zirconium (Zr) and hafnium (Hf) resources within the Port Hope Simpson-St. Lewis CREE District of Southeast Labrador. The Company's projects include Deep Fox Resource, Foxtrot Resource, Fox Meadow Prospect, Silver Fox Prospect and other REE prospects, including Fox Valley, Foxy Lady and Awesome Fox, along a 64 kilometers (km) long belt forming a REE District in Labrador. The Deep Fox Resource is located approximately two km northeast of the port of St. Lewis on the southeast Labrador coast, within 12 km of the Foxtrot resource. The Fox Meadow Prospect is located approximately 11 km west of Port Hope Simpson and one km northwest of a gravel forest access road which extends southwestward from the Trans-Labrador Highway. The Red Wine property is located approximately 80 km north-east of Churchill Falls, Labrador.


TSXV:SMY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Dee10on Mar 02, 2004 9:01pm
318 Views
Post# 7149081

Multi-Protocol Readers: Another View

Multi-Protocol Readers: Another ViewNot sure if this has been posted https://subscriptions.aimglobal.org/moredetails.asp?article=55&list=1 Date: Feb 18, 2004 MULTI-PROTOCOL READERS: ANOTHER VIEW Cliff Horwitz, CEO of SAMSys, argues that, far from being an impediment to present standardization efforts, multi-frequency, multi-protocol readers are the path to the future. In the January issue we looked at whether readers that supported multiple protocols and multiple frequencies would have an effect on the volumes - and therefore price - of any one type of tag. The answer to that question was "yes." The logical conclusion was that multi-protocol, multi-frequency readers might actually be a hindrance to the development of a single standard and might serve to keep tag costs higher than might otherwise be possible. Herein is the problem with logic - at least in this case. The problem, according to some, was that while the conclusion may have been logical, the question was not. It is true that allowing more than one type of tag to be used in a given application (such as Wal-Mart or the DoD) will reduce volumes and keep costs higher in the short term. On the other hand, the idea that tag cost is the major cost issue is one of the great myths in RFID today, according to Cliff Horwitz, CEO of SAMSys, Inc., a manufacturer of RFID readers. "The cost of the system is far greater than the cost of the tags," Horwitz pointed out. "Having to install multiple readers or, worse, having to replace readers to adapt to evolving technology is far more expensive than some incremental tag costs." SAMSys pioneered the multi-frequency, multi-protocol reader (more commonly known as "agile" readers) at a time when standards were not well formed. According to Horwitz, the concept was to provide users with a way to implement RFID without fear of having their investment becoming obsolete. Now that standards are being adopted, the need is still there. "At this point," Horwitz says, "no single standard can be broad enough and comprehensive enough to encompass all the complexities of RFID." He also pointed out that standardization is not yet finished. In the short term, Horwitz said, "Agile readers are actually aiding and abetting deployment during a time when the standards process is still becoming better defined. They make it possible for companies to conduct the pilot programs they need to undertake in order to a) become familiar with the technology and b) go forward with full implementation - without fear of obsolescence." Over the longer term, Horwitz continued,"It seems to be generally accepted, within both the mandates of Wal-Mart, the DoD, Meto and others, that there will be multiple classes of tags that will operate at different frequencies. In order to complete implantation throughout the supply chain, the use of multiple frequencies and multiple protocols will be necessary. For example, Class 0 and Class 3 tags side-by-side will require different protocols (at least) and likely multiple frequencies. There may also need to be some differences in frequencies according to the national regulatory issues in the destination country." Wal-Mart apparently supports this view, encouraging its suppliers to purchase agile readers with an eye to future developments. Both Wal-Mart and the DoD admit they are still exploring applications and encourage their suppliers to do the same. Agile readers will permit them to experiment more easily. Horwitz also pointed out that the current EPC tags are not the ultimate goal for carton and pallet tagging. Most of the current implementations are looking forward to the development of Version 2 EPC protocols and standards. And beyond. Horwitz believes that tag costs will come down in any event. "But," he adds, "at a certain point economies of scale offer a diminishing return. While volumes must reach a critical mass, or tipping point, to make tag costs more reasonable, there's only so far tag costs can come down." "Again," Horwitz concluded, "tag cost is not really the most significant issue. Obsolescence is the real threat. Agile readers help future-proof today's applications." SAMSys: 'www.samsys.com '
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse