RE:RE:RE:Updates from Black Swan GrapheneOgopogo26,
You stated "Unprofessional as usual. Do you talk like this in person, meeting company officials at their office? You may think what you want about individuals or companies but your language is inappropriate and disqualifies you".
You mean to say you didn't search for and find couple of spelling mistakes Ogopogo26 , lol!
So, you are now the self-appointed arbiter deciding what is and what is not professionally stated, lol!
Blackswanben knows that my questions, observations and commentary provided are more than just valid Ogopogo26.
I tell it like it is; not how you would have me tell it.
I simply asked blackswanben whether the "more exciting developments" which he alluded to are of a "tangible deliverables" kind, quality and quantum and whether such "more exciting Black Swan Graphene developments" are either less or more likely to have a net positive impact on the SWAN.V share price"?
Why would such a question offend you Ogopogo26?
When I stated "I also tend to view tangible deliverables as being successful company achievements which SWAN representatives are able to specifically attatch a dollar figure to", I stated such a comment as a matter of fact.
I'll reiterate that BSG recently attaining the ability to process manufacture150 Kg of the company's proprietary Graphene Enhanced Masterbatch product is appreciated; and yet, the questions remain as to what the current contracted manufacturing capacity demand for said product is and would such contracted demand be of the bonafide and bankable kind at present?
What's more, it's clear that you obviously do not appreciate my comments and suggestion with respect to that albatross around the neck of Black Swan Graphene like impact, i.e. the very pejorative impact on Black Swan Graphene which Mason Resources nearer to largest SWAN.V equity ownership position does exert.
Mason Resources Inc, then Mason Graphite, sold 100% of the Lac Gueret graphite asset to Nouveau Monde Graphite.
Mason Resources is now viewed as a mere holding company which is being milked dry by this Fahad Al Tamimi guy and his fellow Mason Resources officers and directors.
Mason Resources provides nothing for Black Swan Graphene and
Black Swan Graphene is greatly impeded by such SWAN.V equity controlling dead weight over at Mason Resources Inc.
As I suggested for Blackswanben, forthwith have SWAN's other stakeholders do something about that Mason Resources impediment.
I'll ask the question once again.
In regards to the portion of Black Swan Graphene equity ownership currently controlled by Mason Resources Inc, is there a specific intention on the part of SWAN principal stakeholders and company management to have that quite sizable portion of SWAN.V equity, which is closer to very roughly 35% or 40%, purchased by a certain world leading proprietary polymer matrix owning chemicals company currently collaborating with Thomas Swan & Co and Black Swan Graphene?
Again, Black Swan Graphene is in desperate need of an entirely other co-controlling equity owner. It's abundantly clear that Black Swan Graphene needs an actual partner and very long term customer and dominant capital financier, i.e. obviously instead of those deadbeat principal stakeholders over at that deadbeat "holding company", Mason Resources Inc.