RE: jsnI have to admit when you came on here touting Sea-whatever it was that allegedly pulled a "spectacular" hole that I had the best laugh from the bullboards that I think I ever had.
You were touting that a geologist would have assumed 500 meters from the hole in all directions would have been mineralized exactly the same as the hole, as the hole was 500 meters long, and that this was a massive discovery. There were only three problems with this assertion. One, the chances of a geologist inferring more that 100 meters from the hole is doubtful at best. Second, it was an angled drill hole, I don't remember exactly but something like 45-55 degrees, so major portions of your assumed "mineralization" was in AIR, above the SURFACE. Third, after two minutes on their website and 5 minutes on sedar.com looking up the latest 43-101, they had drilled the angled hole directly through the center of the KNOWN resource. Your "spectacular" hole was nothing more that Beaufield's "spectacular" metallurgical hole through a known mineralized fold nose.
About the only thing funnier was that NO ONE on this board knew enough or would spend several minutes to find out just how incompetent you really were.
PS--you should learn to spell AND proofread. If you could fix those you could possibly look like an educated dimwit.