Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Slam Exploration Ltd V.SXL

Alternate Symbol(s):  SLMXF

SLAM Exploration Ltd. is a Canadian junior resource company holding a portfolio of gold and base metal projects. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of exploration and evaluation properties in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Ontario, Canada. The Company's projects include Mine Road Project, Menneval Gold Project, Ear Falls Lithium Project, Jake Lee Gold Project, Highway Gold Project, Keezhik Gold, Dam Lake Project, and others. The Mine Road Project is a significant addition to its portfolio of wholly owned BMC projects that include Goodwin, O'Hearn-Strachens, California Lake, Lower 44, LBM, North Rim, Portage, Satellite, Nine Mile, and Red Pine. The Highway project has demonstrated polymetallic potential with 10 known mineral occurrences that include zinc, silver, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and tin as well as gold. The Company holds NSR royalties on the Wedge copper zinc project, Ramsay, Reserve Creek, and Opikeigen gold projects.


TSXV:SXL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by BeerRunon Jan 16, 2013 6:55pm
143 Views
Post# 20847611

RE: RE: Did anyone else see the article

RE: RE: Did anyone else see the article

Yes, I did mean such a move would be good for the juniors, but longer term of course given the degrees of seperation of such a move.
 I think you are right about defining a resource. Slam doesn't get high marks in that regard, IMO. I thought they would have pushed NC more, but I can see scaling back RC as for the rest, in for a penny ....

glta,

BR

Bullboard Posts