Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tamerlane Ventures Inc. V.TAM



TSXV:TAM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by CalifDreamingon Jan 20, 2008 5:16pm
851 Views
Post# 14232640

Nearly identical company - huge value differe

Nearly identical company - huge value differeCheck out this Aussie company - $150MM mc. Almost identical size deposit with lower grades as Pine Point. Nowhere near production. https://www.ironbarkgold.com.au/joomla/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=&task=doc_download&gid=125 The irony is that Ironbark is the cheapest of the plays they list as comparables. And their "flagship" deposit is in northern greenland, with horrendous access issues. How TAM is unable to generate any interest with a $20MM mc is astounding. How on earth can a similar size deposit, years away from production, with lower grades with no infrastructure carry 7.5x higher market cap?
Bullboard Posts