RE:RE:Sky is the limit if Clinical trial shows positive resultsJust a thought or two on bladder cancer. I don't have any personal experience with it but I lost my first wife to ovarian cancer and my second wife, almost, to the same disease. While with my second wife one day while she was receiving chemo we sat next to a woman who had bladder cancer. She has stuck in my mind to this day. Her's was recurrent. She had had several rounds of chemo over the years and each type of treatment had since ceased to be effective. The doctors in the Kelowna hospital had cooked up another chemical concoction for her, one they hoped would work but which require her to travel from Kamloops to Kelowna every week for an afternoon of enduring another 3 hr long chemical drip.. Hers was a life of inconvenience, wigs, nausea, pain and fading hope for something that would return her to a normal life. So, curing bladder cancer isn't just about success rates with conventional treatments. The treatments themselves would not be something that any of us would wish to endure even if we knew it had a high success rate . As it is, bladder cancer - and many other cancers - typically set off a lifetime of treatment, schedules and uncertainty. A high percentage of folks either lose their lives or spend much of their time battling the disease. Contrast that to what Theralase potentially offers. An afternoon with some degree of discomfort, a killing of cancer cells, an activation of an immune response followed by a ride home. No hair loss, no nausea, no pain and lots of hope for a normal tomorrow, So, no, it's not really just about success rates. It's about so many other things that a cancer patient now has to endure. I truly hope this treatment works.