RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Multiple doses in Ph. 2b ...U want indignation, u want shirking of responsibility, u want new investors to feel good about this company?? How about worrying about the first thing they read about this company??? The first thing is the description at the top of this page. The description of this company as dealing with chronic knee pain and omitting any mention of the word cancer. AS A NEW INVESTOR, WHAT WOULD A NEW INVESTOR THINK OF THAT DESCRIPTION??THEIR reaction could be, knees pain???? I thought this outfit was about cancer treatment, must have the wrong company , seeya!!! And I'm the problem holding investors back??? No I'm one of the few fukkers here expecting our ceo to be great, and when he's not, as my employee, I will let him know about it!! Too many here have accepted mediocrity as the norm. Is ten years 23 pennies closer to great or mediocre, is four years of no cancer mentioned on the description of us above, great or mediocre? is no pr, great or mediocre. Is not bringing pharma on board, great or mediocre, is rewarding the manipulators , great or mediocre, Is fuKing up nrs great or mediocre. I take no pleasure in calling out our ceo. But when there are obvious issues, they need to be addressed. And ignoring them, hiding them, diminishing their importance, only allows there continuation in the future. If Roger doesn't like what I say, than don't give me ammunition, fix, the description above, start a bidding war and END all the uncertainty that has been festering and destroying our sp.. I would love to congratulate Roger on his personal actions over the last 11 months. Please give me 2 that I can applaud? Anyone?? Anybody??? Crickets!!! That is the FUKKIN problem, when asked to defend the ceo, crickets is what I get back. That is not good, That is shareholders unable to defend the actions of the ceo.. I've said, there may be things we r unaware of, that may explain things, but as of yet, nothing explains it!!! We wait for the pudding, cus we all know, proof is in the pudding. Roger still has time to make us proud shareholders, or he can make us embarrassed shareholders. We are waiting for the deal. At this crucial time, and u did see itheIR NR today, the mention of financing as a possible impediment to continuing. Nothing is for certain. But I disagree with that view. What is certain is that if Roger sought a bidding war, finances would no longer be an issue. You know why I'm so certain, OUR RESULTS AND OUR SCIENCE!!!!! JUST WISH ROGER BELIEVED AS MUCH IN OUR SCIENCE AND OUR RESULTS AS I DO!!!!!
quote=bionicjoe]
CAinPlap wrote: You supposedly defending Roger White is akin to having the fox guarding the hen house. Please continue posting your own agnostic thoughts but spare us the ruse of you being offended by Mac's posts. I am taking better care of my of my investment by requesting you not be the 2nd person giving the market the lasting impression of Mac's opinion of our CEO 25 times a day. At least try and not be so obvious about it. It takes away from the quality/credibility of the arguments you present.
I don't see you putting in a good word for Roger White. Bencro talks about the great science all the time but when was the last time he posted what a great CEO TLT has? My opinions have nothing to do with you shirking your responsibility to protect your own investment from defamatory comments made against the leadership of this company. You are an odd sort of bird that complains when I try to hold macman1519 accountable for his outrageous remarks but yet allow him to discredit RW with impunity. What do you believe potential new investors are thinking when an agnostic of the science is the only one that is willing to confront a person whose agenda is clearly to destroy the reputation of RW? Where is the shareholder indignation?
[/quote]