Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theralase Technologies Inc. V.TLT

Alternate Symbol(s):  V.TLT.WT | TLTFF

Theralase Technologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage pharmaceutical company. The Company is engaged in the research and development of light activated compounds and their associated drug formulations. The Company operates through two divisions: Anti-Cancer Therapy (ACT) and Cool Laser Therapy (CLT). The Anti-Cancer Therapy division develops patented, and patent pending drugs, called Photo Dynamic Compounds (PDCs) and activates them with patent pending laser technology to destroy specifically targeted cancers, bacteria and viruses. The CLT division is responsible for the Company’s medical laser business. The Cool Laser Therapy division designs, develops, manufactures and markets super-pulsed laser technology indicated for the healing of chronic knee pain. The technology has been used off-label for healing numerous nerve, muscle and joint conditions. The Company develops products both internally and using the assistance of specialist external resources.


TSXV:TLT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Claridgeon Jun 25, 2019 2:40pm
89 Views
Post# 29861526

Prediction of BCG responses in NMIBC in the era of novel imm

Prediction of BCG responses in NMIBC in the era of novel immOn top of efficacy ratios, we also have a much clearer (predictable) technology, when you read the following 11-pages article:

And pay attention to Table 1 too.

Urology - Review
First Online: 01 June 2019
 
Full 11 pages article:
 
 

Abstract

Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) instillations are considered as a gold standard of therapy in high- and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients might experience treatment failure and even 15% of patients initially diagnosed with NMIBC will progress to muscle-invasive disease. Since patients, who fail to respond to BCG, are at particular risk of progression, immediate radical cystectomy (RC) is currently recommended to provide cancer control. However, immunotherapy in NMIBC management still evolves. Immune checkpoint inhibitors emerge as new immunotherapeutics, which in the future might be combined with BCG and may serve as an alternative to radical cystectomy in patients, who failed to respond to BCG alone or are at particular a priori risk of BCG failure, especially if RC is not a safe option. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify NMIBC patients that will not benefit from BCG therapy and demand radical cystectomy. In the following review, we attempt to focus on several clinical and molecular factors and demonstrate the efforts directed to unravel their significance in BCG-failure risk assessment.

...


Conclusion

BCG failure in high-risk NMIBC remains enigmatic clinical phenomenon and significant therapeutic problem. Simultaneously, with advances in understanding of tumour microenvironment, emergence of novel therapies targeting immune response is observed. Early identification of individuals who are at particular risk of developing BCG resistance might aid selecting patients who could benefit most from combined treatment. Potentiation of BCG instillations with immune checkpoint inhibition might contribute to reducing overtreatment with radical cystectomy. Clinical trials evaluating such combination therapies are underway, but their exact clinical implementation in NMIBC remains unclear. Although histopathological features are currently the best predictors of recurrence and progression, an urgent need for new predictors of response to BCG remains apparent. Better understanding of BCG resistance pathophysiology might bring development of novel predictive models that can be easily utilized in planning patient-adjusted therapy.


Bullboard Posts