Just saw Dawg’s data trackerUpdated data interpretation noted....thanks.
Just noted what appears to be a minor error (transposed 180 day pending & total responders %s) in the optimized treatment table:
Study II Clinical Study Data (Optimized: Post August 1, 2020):
Assessment (Days) | Complete Response (“CR”)2 | Partial Response (“PR”)3 | Pending4 | CR (Evaluable Patients)5 | Total Responders (CR + PR)6 | Potential Responders (CR + PR + Pending)7 |
90 | 52.2% | 17.4% | 13.0% | 60.0% | 69.6% | 82.6% |
180 | 22.2% | 18.5% | 40.7% | 40.0% | 42.3% | 83.0% |
270 | 14.8% | 3.7% | 59.3% | 36.4% | 18.5% | 77.8% |
360 | 3.7% | 7.4% | 66.7% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 77.8% |
450 | 3.7% | 3.7% | 66.7% | 11.1% | 7.4% | 74.1% |
I believe should read:
Study II Clinical Study Data (Optimized: Post August 1, 2020):
Assessment (Days) | Complete Response (“CR”)2 | Partial Response (“PR”)3 | Pending4 | CR (Evaluable Patients)5 | Total Responders (CR + PR)6 | Potential Responders (CR + PR + Pending)7 |
90 | 52.2% | 17.4% | 13.0% | 60.0% | 69.6% | 82.6% |
180 | 22.2% | 18.5% | 42.3% | 40.0% | 40.7% | 83.0% |
270 | 14.8% | 3.7% | 59.3% | 36.4% | 18.5% | 77.8% |
360 | 3.7% | 7.4% | 66.7% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 77.8% |
450 | 3.7% | 3.7% | 66.7% | 11.1% | 7.4% | 74.1% |