RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Ten years ago we talked of 100 $ plus share price .N0taP00p wrote: Ironic, isn't it, when you ask infinity for proof and yet you assert that the stock is being held down like you do know that for a fact. I'm really not sure why some of you think it is unreasonable to expect more frequent and transparent communications. We're not asking them to publish usage stats for bathroom breaks. Keeping investors updated is basic. For example, if you don't get any bites on the fishing line for a month after you cast it for money, you simply say so rather than wait for a whole month after the deadline. That is just one example. A key person like Vera leaving should not have been a one-liner buried in your report. Can create an impression of not having confidence in your own product and being reactive. Not having a PR person is no excuse. I'm still holding all my shares accumulated over 10+ years and bought some more this month.
Well said.
So true. Thay are only good at doing PP to dilute, and to harm royal long shareholders' value...