RE:Interesting observation RedCanaanR wrote: Yes very interesting but l have one to offer as well..When l first joined SH there were no likes and Khersons was plagued by 14 crazed trolls led by Joenomoney as you are all aware. There were if l remember there were no likes back then and Khersons and the trolls were a one board phenomenal. CHE. Then first l and then you got involved and we're instrumental to their removal , no big loss to SH at that time , but again , always a but.they were smart enough to realize the potential for their agenda as both you and l post on a variety of boards. Now this wasn't small potatoes to them , it created a venue for them trolling us many times over multiplied by the number of boards we ever posted on. They quickly invented more handles than you can count ,The Trevor's , the Clowns the list was endless. Oh sure they removed many but created 2 for everyone removed to look proactive. When my take extended to calling out those responsible the expulsions started , for no rule violations and the Powers that be removed multiple accounts as a violation. Now why was that .You stated that they didn't have the time or resources to address the issue.That is complete BS and you know it . If they can respond to fake abuse reports to remove me and suspend you once they can respond and remove every new slug as fast as they are created. In their case they are liars and rewrites and vulgar video posters. Those my friend are expulsion crimes. Why ignore , , l go with when probably hundreds of real posters push abuse and that trash office does nothing they push ignore and that indirectly supports the garbage dump. Finally In the land of Oz a CEO glommed on to Hey this creates hundreds of thousands of fraud reads , over A hundred thousand fraud likes and Boy is this great to show prospective advertisers how popular and relevant they are. That two is a crime for promoting knowingly false marketing. Now if you want to continue to defend , then go for it. Remember this , on the first page of Market Heralds website, thanks for that, Jag Sanger is there in all his glory bragging how he and only he is responsible for all editorial comment on every company he owns. Now that is my TAKE and REBUTTAL.
Hey Canaan__NICE POST__Some GOOD Discussion !!!!
BUT__Gotta take EXCEPTION to the HighLighted Statement__as There is NO WAY MySelf__OR ANYONE ELSE Not IN the
PRIVATE OwnerShip GROUP__Would Know of ANY DETAILS
With Regard to THEIR REOURCE Allocations/Amountsl