RE:John KellyHe has even more reason to step up now. But we definitely don't need the number of directors we have and it is too easy to start with reducing by longest tenure directors who are inherently most responsible for oversight over poor performance. Combine that with irrelevant recent experience and it is a no brainer. I think making over $150,000 from the company while the shareholders have suffered for 6-7 years with no gains but even an opportunity loss of additional 40+ percent is more than enough and time to reduce those costs or bring in someone with the expertise that is needed.