Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company develops its 60% owned Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,918 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by CobraShelbyon Nov 20, 2023 9:44am
81 Views
Post# 35744087

RE:RE:Seabridge just publish this KSM Licence of Occupation

RE:RE:Seabridge just publish this KSM Licence of OccupationFordster:  I do not think so :

At this time, I think this will force TUD to fast track their PEA and prove the reserved faster.

At the same time, this will force Sea to fast track also their tunel path since they have never provided to anyone as far that I know of any data to anyone that tunnel path was going to a third party land and there was no economic impact to TUD ( We know now Goldstorm is there ) . If anyone can provide the data that SEA was suppose to provide doing 40 drill holes, please fell free to provide this info , but I think this was never done or just a couple hole has been perform . This requirement was never met for this licence of occupation.

M. ES is involve in both company and discussion must take place between these 2 .
He has invested over or close to  300m   in these 2 and we do not need another battle  between these 2 , like what happen almost 10 years ago 

Pretty sure ES will have a big say to these discussions to make them agree on something for the good of both of them  .
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>