Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia... see more

TSXV:TUD - Post Discussion

Tudor Gold Corp > Details Details
View:
Post by Sasha11 on Jul 04, 2024 12:36pm

Details Details

The last couple of news releases smell of desperation.   The share price is tanked because experts know this is not a project, at least not the one they are trying to sell.   Tudor now seems to be alluding to a smaller higher grade (possibly partially underground) project.  But why lose the advantage of economies of scale for large open pit operation?   That is because the majority, perhaps close to all of their stated 25+ million ounces of a low grade resource is uneconomic.  They need to put out the sample grade, recovery, and method of the test work that is briefly referred to in the news release.  Compare that to the assumed mining cut-off grade and in context with their MRE.  How promoting of this illusion to the general public has been allowed for so long by the securities regulators is a joke, and why the TSX junior mining index is treated as such.
Comment by Stockmoves1 on Jul 04, 2024 1:09pm
That is one very deflamatory post !! you better hope your right ..
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 04, 2024 1:12pm
He's not....
Comment by Larry60 on Jul 04, 2024 1:16pm
He/she voiced an opinion........not a crazy one either although not one i fully agree with (i agree with the smell of desperation).  As usual, the freakin self appointed hall monitors are out in full force....... just take today as a rare win......up nicely!!!  
Comment by Stockmoves1 on Jul 04, 2024 1:29pm
A lot of liability in a post like that when proved wrong.. posts like that get stored for later defamation cases .
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 04, 2024 1:37pm
Shorts getting scared?
Comment by MrVerbatim9800 on Jul 04, 2024 3:15pm
Yup, nailed it. TUD strike price is .73
Comment by Larry60 on Jul 04, 2024 1:59pm
Stockmoves, sashas point was pretty mild and clearly based on opinion............which is not unreasonable given the facts.   TUD has sunk to 5 year lows in a buoyant mining market and on the back of $2350 gold!!!! If I was sasha, i wouldnt be worried. You might want to worry about your posts encouragin people TO BORROW MONEY AGAINST THEIR HOMES to invest in TC!  Even worse, you ...more  
Comment by rockport1 on Jul 04, 2024 3:27pm
Sasha, I think you misunderstand why Tudor is focussed on the high grade. They are not abandoning the low grade as you imply.  This intent of delineating high grade cells is for mine planning economics. If high grade cells can be mined early in the mine plan, then payback can come much sooner, making the project that much more attractive. The lower grade will still be mined. I disagree with ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 04, 2024 3:48pm
He doesn't misunderstand anything...he's deliberately casting shade on Ken and TUD...blatantly saying that they are lying.....
Comment by cskhurasu on Jul 04, 2024 8:37pm
You are comparing apples and oranges. KSM has a strip ratio of 0.5/1.0mi the early years and the gold and copper are recovered with simple, conventional methods. 
Comment by TeckPro on Jul 05, 2024 7:49am
SEA = NO MTT + NO JV. TUD/TC has much better grades and location than SEA/KSM.  Interesting notes re SEA.  1)At the top of the company's list of goals for 2024 is finding a joint venture partner for KSM. 2)Seabridge also announced that during the quarter ending March 31, it posted a net loss of CA$8.2 million.  6 months gone by in 2024 and not a prep regarding a JV. Not ...more  
Comment by Sasha11 on Jul 05, 2024 8:08am
Its simple then give the public the information.  What is the recovery and grade of the concentrate or the leach or whatever it is Tudor is using to match the average  25 Moz resource grade.   They wont do it, despite saying they have done the test work.  You cant have one set of numbers for the resource and allude to another higher grade for mining and metallurgy.  ...more  
Comment by dingdong01 on Jul 05, 2024 9:09am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by cskhurasu on Jul 05, 2024 12:00pm
It's one thing to find a process that liberates the gold and it's another thing to fir the process requirements and costs within a cash flow projection and environmental permit. The PEA should make an attempt to reconcile these parameters. We shall see.
Comment by Sasha11 on Jul 05, 2024 12:20pm
To address the backroom boiler room boys from earlier posts today, why isn’t Tudor putting out this data and in more detail?  A February 5 2024 NR states KSM average copper grade is 0.27 to 0.41 and carries most of the gold, although PEA shows barely makes saleable copper conc grade and with relatively poor recovery.  Tudor stated resource grade is 0.18% Cu (don’t cherry pick higher ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 05, 2024 12:48pm
Yes the  numbers I grabbed are from the 2022 technical report.... The numbers you are quoting are only for Kerr/iron cap...the Mitchell/sulphurets numbers are lower and dilute through grades....
Comment by highper on Jul 07, 2024 6:10am
Duh! Gomer, tudor has been working on the metallurgy all along....ken mentioned two south african specialist companies in his videos... He also said the metallurgy for the CS 600 zone is straightforward.  so were the south africans working on the A 300 metallurgy??..  and did ken's stated recovery expectations refer to the A 300 material??? .....you'd best hop off your ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 05, 2024 10:22am
That's actually another lie....KSM copper grade is 0.16%. TC is 0.18% over all, and if you look at CS-600 it is 0.31%......you may not want to lie about numbers that are easily verifiable....
Comment by Stockmoves1 on Jul 05, 2024 11:35am
All the more reason to nail his back to the wall when these low lifes get called out for defamation lawsuits !!
Comment by rockport1 on Jul 05, 2024 12:53pm
Yes, apples to oranges.  Here is another basket: Seabridge KSM recoveries from their technical report: "Copper and gold flotation recoveries will vary with changes in head grade and mineralogy. The LOM average copper and gold recoveries to the concentrate and dor are projected to be 80.2% and 71.7%, respectively, for the LOM mill feed containing 0.64 g/t gold and 0.14% copper. As ...more  
Comment by Sasha11 on Jul 05, 2024 2:19pm
KSM doesnt need Albion, and the mineralogy is not refractory while Tudor at least admitted theres was in the last technical report painting a less than rosy picture.  Lets end the speculation have Tudor release the flowsheet to date (after years of test work), corresponding recovery and concentrate grades for the average feed grade from the resource.  It wont be 25+ million ounces, and I ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 05, 2024 2:26pm
The PEA will silence all of the doubters..
Comment by Larry60 on Jul 05, 2024 3:17pm
PEA is a first preliminary step towrards moving forward.  Accordin to the message from KK this week, looking at summer 2025 at a minimum!  In any event, would luv to see some comforting info!!!! will doubters be silenced??  I hope so!  But PEAs are notorious for not being worth the paper theyre written on........................and often detiorate economically dramatically ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities