RE:RE:RE:Questions:GWG is not a sure thing either but it is further along and has the right recipe (upstream and downstream assets) and I acknowledge that there may be some more bumps along the road. All you see and preach is blue skies and daffodils for UCU and doom and gloom for GWG - talk about dishonest.
Why do you think UCU will turn out any different than Moly or Lynas, the only difference I see is more of a slant towards the heavies but a much much weaker grade (Moly TREO is 6.57%, Lynas TREO is 9.73%, GWG TREO is 14%, UCU at 0.61)?
How will UCU handle the Uranium content at Dotson or are you still going with your story that it doesn't have any and is geologically different. You said that Steenskamskraal is too "hot" and will likely need Chinese robots to do the mining (is that really honest debate as you claim the reason you spend so much time on GWG board?) because of thorium content yet UCU has Uranium which is much more difficult to handle - following that logic will UCU need more sophisticated USA Robots to mine?
What's taking so long for UCU to get the FS started. Didn't they say by the end of the year?