RE: icj is no longer with urp and vice versa FATMAN--WHY WOULD YOU KNOW THIS,AND NOT THE SHAREHOLDERS SUCH AS I,AM.MICHAEL COULTER CLAIMED IN A TELEPHONE CALL A FEW MONTHS AGO THAY ICJ AND NAYARIT MADE A SHARE FOR SHARE DEAL ABOUT A YEAR BEFORE THIS PHONE CALL,AND HE WANTED TO KNOW WHY I WAS INTERESTED WITH REGARD TO THE NUMBER OF SHARES I HAD,WHICH WAS 88000 THEN AND 200,000OF URP AT THE TIME OF THE CALL.THE TWO NEW CLAIMS ICJ HAS,BELONGED TO A FRIEND OF MINE WHO KNEW HE WAS DYING AND ASKED ME TO TAKE OVER WHICH I COULD NOT AT THAT TIME,HE KNEW HIS CLAIMS HAD THE GOODS.AND ICJ AND URP MUST HAVE THE SAME.I ALSO WROTE IN A B.B THAT INCO GOLD MAY OWN 55 PERCENT OF THIS PROPERTY.SEE 1991-2 CANADIAN MINES HANDBOOK FOR VERIFICATION.GOOD LUCK TO ALL SHAREHOLDERS.