... recommend that folks go back and read some ...... older press releases regarding the Scorpion Rig and how it was not effective at SGV and that most if the Au and Pathfinder in groundwater results were taken from the geoprobe whichbonoybhad the ability to reach down 75 metres or so. And it could only take a 1 dimensional water sample. The scorpion rig had trouble penetrating boulders in the gravel at SGV.
What is my point? If Scorpion rig was effective at SGV, we may have even more Au and Pathfinder in groundwater anomalies to work with and we may have bedrock samples as well. But the companybhas been pretty clear in previous and early releases that Scorpion Rig was not a very useful tool at SGV and geoprobe was onlynprtially effective.
Either way, we are beyond the groundwater phase at SGV. We are now using actual core results to vector towards the source of the anomaly. And with hole 6, we may have just got looking on the last hole of phase I. It would be highly unlikely for the bottom 230 metres of hole 6 to be barren of gold based on everything I have read about CTGD’s. That said, I am not a geologist. I am a novice investor. So do your own due diligence first.
Bring on hole 6 results!
ShellsRFun69