RE:RE:RE:RE:Actually the battery tests!Its OK Varna...mdjbrown cannot even spin correctly. Here is what he posted ( below in red). Now imagine if their hero, Mr T.D.sent some 99.999999999999% pure graphite as they claim they have, to Panasonic and they do their testing.
Panasonic would first of all look at the graphite and say.....hey man this is pretty good looking graphite (very pure chit) and then run their tests.......for 100 times (cycles) and get a good 200 mAh/gr. I say Panasonic HAS LIKELY SOME CSPG graphite which is why one of their executives was so motivated and so concerned to email Panasonicl and upset that they would wish to test a more superior anode of a competitor (sjl). The answer he got was correct, because we now know that SJL's graphene had not be sent to Panasoniic as inquired by said exec, but rather, likely Panasonic had seen some test results and was quite interested now to try the graphene material for the battery. THAT IS WHY, THE ATTACKS STARTED SO FEVERISHLY ON THIS BOARD, calls to universities, patent searches, checking peoples messages or at least attempting, banning astute posters on this board.......you name it. THEY WERE TERRIFIED of having their PURE GRAPHITE being SHOWN UP by SJL!!! Well..........now its too late!!! Panasonic has the goods from SJL and we shall hear in the distant future which product they like best.....this is all my connect the dots take on everything plus some intel that has been passed on to me about goings on from various sources. PURE OPINION....just like mdjbrowns, but the difference is, I have my laid my bets down and even increased it because all of this negative attention and hate towards SJL.....they are the BEAUTIFUL ONE and Panasonic is going to give its rose out soon enough....
So now, my guess is Panasonic is running their tests with the graphene ( I have this image of Elon Musk calling everyday likely wanting to hear the results) and they should get conservatively a 30% to 50% increase in performance with a chance for even higher under certain conditions if the following VERIFIED BATTERY TEST RESULTS are confirmed under their own testing: (I found this in mdjbrown's recent post.....which imspired me to write this post.....THANKS/MUCHOS GRACIAS......your genius made you look dumb because you are getting now a summary of why there is unnecessary negativity on the board from your group of hyenas when the Graphene tests blow any graphite cos material OUT OF THE WATER....
Over 100 cycles the discharge capacity for the graphite was 200 to 220 mAh/g and for the graphene 310 to 330 mAh/g.
Although very preliminary at this point, the graphene battery has outperformed the graphite battery, as demonstrated by a greater discharge capacity of approximately 30%. Both batteries were made with the same material, battery “A” graphite anode and “B” graphene anode.
Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard#P5RI4P5skwbELehd.99