Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Western Wind Energy Corp V.WND



TSXV:WND - Post by User

Post by Probabilityon Jan 24, 2013 4:35pm
228 Views
Post# 20886747

smear campaign

smear campaign

These two requests by Brookfield were moot. Firstly, Mr. Ciachurski was not involved in any of the meetings with Brookfield nor did Mr. Ciachurski speak with any of the members from Brookfield, either as a whole or individually during this process from the 17th. Mr. Ciachurski is also excluded from any of the Independent Committee meetings. Secondly, since Brookfield, as a major insider, is proposing a bid greater than $2.50, the Board of Western Wind has a statutory obligation to reject the preexisting $2.50 bid. That is a fundamental obligation to keep it's shareholders informed.

Read more: https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/1033480#ixzz2IvnMiZyM

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse