Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Western Wind Energy Corp V.WND

TSXV:WND - Post Discussion

View:
Post by zaktaylor on Dec 17, 2011 6:51pm

State Law





             California state law requires 30 percent renewable energy by 2020. That's the only thing Western Wind Energy needs. It builds a wind farm it will get a long term contract.  In general renewable energy is pretty much screwed because competing with the declining prices in natural gas is going to be tough. But it seems the sky is the limit in California.
Comment by jonathanstjohn2 on Dec 17, 2011 6:57pm
I agree. That's why I own stock in it.Too bad they are destroying the market value by jer.king off on their shareholders.
Comment by zaktaylor on Dec 17, 2011 7:58pm
Warren Buffet just dropped 2.9 billion dollars for two solar projects in California.  It would make perfect sense for him to buy Windstar also.  How much per MW did he pay? Does anyone know?
Comment by jonathanstjohn2 on Dec 17, 2011 9:40pm
Jesus
Comment by Xtrykr0 on Dec 18, 2011 1:16am
Knowing Buffet, probably at a "HUGE" discount.
Comment by dirac on Dec 18, 2011 12:20pm
here is one example, but I dont know how to compare solar with wind, wind seems cheaper. its the fixed long term price and the tax credit that attracts him https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/buffett-gets-u-s-incentive-high-power-rates-in-2-billion-solar-farm-bet.html?cmpid=yhoo
Comment by peakoiled on Dec 19, 2011 4:15pm
Buffett bought the 550MW topaz project for $2B USD. So $3.63M per MW: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-07/buffett-gets-u-s-incentive-high-power-rates-in-2-billion-solar-farm-bet.html?cmpid=yhoo
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse