TSXV:WTR.H - Post by User
Comment by
HighTeston Jun 17, 2009 1:47am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
343 Views
Post# 16076527
RE: RE: RE: any thoughts?
RE: RE: RE: any thoughts?Doing the kj/kg to BTU/ pound, I see 23.1 meters of 9345 BTU/pound washed coal with 22.6 % ash and 1.5% sulphur, which is pretty good. Considering that it is 29 m below the surface overburden, that makes it even better. One sample hit 10471 BTU washed, which is only 29 BTU short of Sub-bituminous A rank. Not bad for three holes to start with, and two holes awaiting washability results still.
Also, according to the 43-101 report, the holes drilled were priorty rank 4 or 5. They were done sooner due to quicker permitting in Manitoba. The block north of GXS is the one to watch, IMO.
BTU converter:
https://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/units-converter/fuel-efficiency-mass/calculator/Btu-(IT)-per-pound-%5BBtu/lb%5D-to-kilojoule-per-kilogram-%5BkJ/kg%5D/